Advances in Therapy · 2021 · 48 citations · 31 references
MedicineOncologyElectronic Health RecordsOutcomes ResearchSurvival AnalysisClinical Effectiveness AssessmentClinical Outcome AssessmentClinical TrialsResponse AssessmentSurvival OutcomesTherapy Response AssessmentClinical Relevance AssessmentNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TherapyOncologic Outcomes AssessmentRecist CriteriaTherapy Response EvaluationTreatment Effectiveness MeasurementTreatment Response CriteriaTumor Response Evaluation
INTRODUCTION: Effectiveness metrics for real-word research, analogous to clinical trial ones, are needed. This study aimed to develop a real-world response (rwR) variable applicable to solid tumors and to evaluate its clinical relevance and meaningfulness. METHODS: This retrospective study used patient cohorts with advanced non-small cell lung cancer from a nationwide, de-identified electronic health record (EHR)-derived database. Disease burden information abstracted manually was classified into response categories anchored to discrete therapy lines (per patient-line). In part 1, we quantified the feasibility and reliability of data capture, and estimated the association between rwR status and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and real-world overall survival (rwOS). In part 2, we investigated the correlation between published clinical trial overall response rates (ORRs) and real-world response rates (rwRRs) from corresponding real-world patient cohorts. RESULTS: In part 1, 85.4% of patients (N = 3248) had at least one radiographic assessment documented. Median abstraction time per patient-line was 15.0 min (IQR 7.8-28.1). Inter-abstractor agreement on presence/absence of at least one assessment was 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96; n = 503 patient-lines abstracted in duplicate); inter-abstractor agreement on best confirmed response category was 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86; n = 384 with at least one captured assessment). Confirmed responders at a 3-month landmark showed significantly lower risk of death and progression in rwOS and rwPFS analyses across all line settings. In part 2, rwRRs (from 12 rw cohorts) showed a high correlation with trial ORRs (Spearman's ρ = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a rwR variable generated from clinician assessments documented in EHRs following radiographic evaluations. This variable provides clinically meaningful information and may provide a real-world measure of treatment effectiveness.
31
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Martin Reck, Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu, Andrew Robinson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 10.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
H. Borghaei, L. Paz-Ares, Leora Horn et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 9.5K citations · Full text
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Julie R. Brahmer, Karen L. Reckamp, Lucio Crinò et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 8.6K citations · Full text
Pharmacy, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +15