Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy · 2021 · 48 citations · 10 references
Veterinary MedicineImmunologyInfectious DiseasesMolecular DiagnosticsMolecular VirologyVirologyDiagnostic ImmunologyInfectious Disease Molecular TestingRespiratory DiseaseRespiratory InfectionsRespiratory Infectious DiseasesViral DiagnosticsClinical Utility AssessmentCoronavirus DiagnosticsObservational Study AnalysisObservational Study EvaluationReal-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (Pcr)Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (Rt-pcr)Sars-cov-2 InfectionSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome
INTRODUCTION: Several antigen tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed worldwide, but their clinical utility has not been well established. In this study, we evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag, a newly developed antigen test in Japan. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted at a PCR center between October 7 and December 5, 2020. The included patients were referred from a local public health center and 89 primary care facilities. We simultaneously obtained two nasopharyngeal samples with flocked swabs; one was used for the antigen test and the other for real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). Using the results of real-time RT-PCR as a reference, the performance of the antigen test was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1186 patients were included in this study, and the real-time RT-PCR detected SARS-CoV-2 in 105 (8.9%). Of these 105 patients, 33 (31.4%) were asymptomatic. The antigen test provided a 98.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.0%-99.4%) concordance rate with real-time RT-PCR, along with a sensitivity of 86.7% (95% CI: 78.6%-92.5%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 99.7%-100%). False-negatives were observed in 14 patients, 8 of whom were asymptomatic and had a low viral load (cycle threshold (Ct) > 30). In symptomatic patients, the sensitivity was 91.7% (95% CI: 82.7%-96.9%). CONCLUSION: QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag showed high specificity and sufficient sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. This test is a promising potential diagnostic modality especially in symptomatic patients.
10
Seungjae Lee, Tark Kim, Eun Jung Lee et al. · JAMA Internal Medicine · 2020 · 546 citations · Full text
Reed Magleby, Lars F. Westblade, Alex Trzebucki et al. · Clinical Infectious Diseases · 2020 · 438 citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Acute Care Medicine +16