Clinical ophthalmology · 2021 · 27 citations · 11 references
Health ProfessionsOphthalmologyOptometryClinical OptometryOcular DiseaseOphthalmic EpidemiologyDry Eye DiseaseDry Eye EvaluationEye ConditionsOphthalmic SolutionsTopical Ophthalmic MedicationsVisual Impairment EpidemiologyClinical Effectiveness MeasurementComparative Clinical EffectivenessDry Eye AssessmentDry Eye Disease ManagementDry Eye SymptomatologyHealthcare Provider CertificationMedical Chart ReviewTreatment Patterns Epidemiology
PURPOSE: This study evaluated real-world treatment of dry eye disease (DED) with lifitegrast. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ophthalmologists and optometrists treating patients with DED were invited to participate through a healthcare provider (HCP)-based panel. HCPs completed a provider survey and contributed data toward a chart review for up to five qualifying patients with DED who initiated lifitegrast ophthalmic solution (index date) between 01/01/2017 (US) or 01/01/2018 (Canada) and 06/30/2019. Patient demographics, treatments, clinical characteristics, and outcomes (ie, severity, signs, symptoms) were collected for the 6-month pre-index period and up to 12-months post-index. RESULTS: For this study, 517 HCPs contributed 600 patient charts. Among 554 and 281 patients with follow-up at 6 and 12-months post-index, 512 (92.4%) and 238 (84.7%) patients had ongoing lifitegrast treatment, respectively. Other DED-related treatments were less frequently used post-index with lifitegrast vs pre-index: over-the-counter artificial tear use (45.2% vs 75.5%), topical corticosteroids (3.8% vs 18.8%), any cyclosporine (3.0% vs 20.5%). At 3-months (n=571) and 12-months (n=320) post-index vs pre-index, fewer patients had eye dryness (47 [8.2%] and 16 [5.0%] vs 525 [87.5%]), blurred vision (28 [4.9%] and 11 [3.4%] vs 346 [57.7%]), ocular burning/stinging (25 [4.4%] and 8 [2.5%] vs 336 [56.0%]), depression (8 [1.4%] and 9 [2.8%] vs 55 [9.2%]), fatigue (4 [0.7%] and 1 [0.3%] vs 82 [13.7%]), and headache (1 [0.2%] and 0 vs 19 [3.2%]). At 3 and 12-months post-index vs pre-index, average corneal staining score was numerically lower (2.7 and 2.0 vs 6.5), and average Schirmer score (10.6 and 10 vs 6.3) and tear film break-up time (7.3 and 8.0 vs 4.8) higher. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients had ongoing lifitegrast treatment 6-months post-index with reduction in overall treatment burden. Improvement in DED signs and symptoms, including QoL impacts, was evident at 3 months and up to 12 months after lifitegrast initiation.
11
Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease
Johnny L. Gayton · Clinical ophthalmology · 2009 · 591 citations · Full text
Medicine, Ophthalmology, Surgery +14
Dry Eye Disease: Impact on Quality of Life and Vision
Miki Uchino, Debra A. Schaumberg · Current Ophthalmology Reports · 2013 · 447 citations · Full text
Medicine, Dermatology, Ophthalmology +12
Lifitegrast Ophthalmic Solution 5.0% for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
John D. Sheppard, Gail Torkildsen, John Lonsdale et al. · Ophthalmology · 2013 · 217 citations
Lifitegrast for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
Edward J. Holland, Jodi Luchs, Paul Karpecki et al. · Ophthalmology · 2016 · 209 citations · Full text
Medicine, Immunology, Ophthalmology +17