Validation of the Italian version of the peritraumatic distress inventory: validity, reliability and factor analysis in a sample of healthcare workers

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Peritraumatic distress as assessed by the <i>Peritraumatic Distress Inventory</i> (PDI), has been consistently shown to predict the development of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after the exposure to a potentially traumatizing event. <b>Objective</b>: The present study aims to validate the Italian version of the PDI in a sample of Healthcare Workers (HCWs) exposed to COVID-19 related potentially traumatizing events. <b>Method</b>: <i>N</i> = 265 HCWs who repeatedly experienced the deaths of patients during COVID-19 emergency in Italy, were enrolled from the Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana (Pisa, Italy). They completed the PDI, Impact Event Scale - revised (IES-R) and the <i>reactions to losses or upsetting events</i> Trauma and Loss Spectrum - Self Report (TALS-SR) domain. <b>Results</b>: Internal consistency was good with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .874. The PDI correlated strongly with measures that was conceptually close (TALS-SR <i>reactions to losses or upsetting events</i> domain; <i>r</i> = .723, <i>p</i> < .001). Participants who scored above the cut-off for PTSD reported significantly higher PDI scores than those who did not (6.47 ± 5.25 vs. 19.11 ± 8.291, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The one-month test-retest reliability (<i>n</i> = 21) was excellent (ICC = .997). Finally, factor analyses revealed that the PDI exhibited a single-factor structure. <b>Conclusions</b>: the Italian version of the PDI showed good psychometric proprieties and may be used to detect those at risk for developing PTSD.