Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2021 · 64 citations · 25 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious Disease ControlInfectious DiseasesDiagnostic MicrobiologyEarly DetectionOutbreak InvestigationAnalytical ValidationSaliva CollectionAcceptable Specimen TypesDiagnostic TestingNasal Swab CollectionNasopharyngeal Swab CollectionSaliva Specimen CollectionSaliva-based DiagnosticsSars-cov-2 InfectionSensitivity
= 227) had a positivity rate of 41%, with sensitivity in NPS, NS, and saliva of 97.9%, 87.1%, and 87.1%, respectively. Whether the reduced sensitivity of NS or saliva is acceptable must be assessed in the settings where they are used. However, we sought to improve on it by validating a method to mix the two sample types, as the combination of nasal swab and saliva resulted in 94.6% SARS-CoV-2 detection sensitivity. Spiking experiments showed that combining them did not adversely affect the detection sensitivity in either. Virus stability in saliva was also investigated, with and without the addition of commercially available stabilizing solutions. The virus was stable in saliva at both 4°C and room temperature for up to 7 days. The addition of stabilizing solutions did not enhance stability and, in some situations, reduced detectable virus levels.
25
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Xavier Robin, Natacha Turck, Alexandre Hainard et al. · BMC Bioinformatics · 2011 · 14K citations · Full text
Saliva is a reliable tool to detect SARS-CoV-2
Lorenzo Azzi, Giulio Carcano, Francesco Gianfagna et al. · Journal of Infection · 2020 · 709 citations · Full text
Neil J. Rowan, John G. Laffey · The Science of The Total Environment · 2020 · 449 citations · Full text
Management, Operations Management, Supply Chain Management +17
Robin Patel, Esther Babady, Elitza S. Theel et al. · mBio · 2020 · 398 citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +17