A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework

Hein de Haas

Comparative Migration Studies · 2021 · 857 citations · 72 references

DOIFull text

Open access

TL;DR

The paper develops an aspirations‑capabilities framework to better understand human mobility as an intrinsic part of social change, conceptualising migration as a function of aspirations and capabilities within perceived geographical opportunities. The framework distinguishes instrumental and intrinsic dimensions of mobility and uses Berlin’s positive and negative liberty concepts to explain how macro‑structural change shapes individuals’ migratory aspirations and capabilities. The framework shows that moving and staying are complementary expressions of agency, defining mobility as the capability to choose where to live, and it explains how social transformation and development shape migration patterns, allowing integration of all forms of mobility into a single meta‑conceptual framework.

Abstract

This paper elaborates an aspirations-capabilities framework to advance our understanding of human mobility as an intrinsic part of broader processes of social change. In order to achieve a more meaningful understanding of agency and structure in migration processes, this framework conceptualises migration as a function of aspirations and capabilities to migrate within given sets of perceived geographical opportunity structures. It distinguishes between the instrumental (means-to-an-end) and intrinsic (directly wellbeing-affecting) dimensions of human mobility. This yields a vision in which moving and staying are seen as complementary manifestations of migratory agency and in which human mobility is defined as people's capability to choose where to live, including the option to stay, rather than as the act of moving or migrating itself. Drawing on Berlin's concepts of positive and negative liberty (as manifestations of the widely varying structural conditions under which migration occurs) this paper conceptualises how macro-structural change shapes people's migratory aspirations and capabilities. The resulting framework helps to understand the complex and often counter-intuitive ways in which processes of social transformation and 'development' shape patterns of migration and enable us to integrate the analysis of almost all forms of migratory mobility within one meta-conceptual framework.

References

72