Social SciencesSocial PsychologyGroup DynamicsIntergroup RelationsSocial DemographyAlgorithmic FairnessBiasFairnessGroup FairnessStatistical ParitySubgroup Fairness
This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. In recent discussions of fairness in computer science, some have maintained that independence is not a suitable measure of group fairness. This position is at least partially based on two influential papers (Dwork et al., 2012, Hardt et al., 2016) that provide arguments against independence. We revisit these arguments, and we find that the case against independence is rather weak. We also give arguments in favor of independence, showing that it plays a distinctive role in considerations of fairness. Finally, we discuss how to balance different fairness considerations.
13
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi et al. · 2012 · 3.4K citations
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Sam Corbett‐Davies, Emma Pierson, Avi Feller et al. · 2017 · 1.1K citations
Law, Criminal Law, Criminology +15
Rich Zemel, Yu Wu, Kevin Swersky et al. · 2013 · 1K citations
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Richard A. Berk, Hoda Heidari, Shahin Jabbari et al. · Sociological Methods & Research · 2018 · 992 citations