Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2021 · 67 citations · 24 references
ComputingEmergency MedicineSurgeryEmergency SurgeryGeneral SurgeryMachine LearningDecision Support In HealthcareDecision TreesDecision-analytic ModelingPredictive Health ModelingPreoperative Risk AssessmentRisk PredictionDecision-making AlgorithmsEmergency Surgery AssessmentEmergency Surgery Risk AssessmentMorbidity Risk PredictionOperative Risk PredictionPerioperative Risk Prediction ModelsPostoperative Risk PredictionSurgical Risk Prediction
BACKGROUND: The Predictive Optimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) tool is an artificial intelligence-based calculator for the prediction of 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing emergency operations. In this study, we sought to assess the performance of POTTER in the emergency general surgery (EGS) population in particular. METHODS: All patients who underwent EGS in the 2017 American College of Surgeons NSQIP database were included. The performance of POTTER in predicting 30-day postoperative mortality, morbidity, and 18 specific complications was assessed using the c-statistic metric. As a subgroup analysis, the performance of POTTER in predicting the outcomes of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 59,955 patients were included. Median age was 50 years and 51.3% were women. POTTER predicted mortality (c-statistic = 0.93) and morbidity (c-statistic = 0.83) extremely well. Among individual complications, POTTER had the highest performance in predicting septic shock (c-statistic = 0.93), respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation for 48 hours or longer (c-statistic = 0.92), and acute renal failure (c-statistic = 0.92). Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, the c-statistic performances of POTTER in predicting mortality and morbidity were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: POTTER is an interpretable, accurate, and user-friendly predictor of 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing EGS. POTTER could prove useful for bedside counseling of patients and their families and for benchmarking of EGS care.
24
Classification and Regression Trees.
John Van Ryzin, Leo Breiman, Jerome H. Friedman et al. · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1986 · 21K citations
Karl Y. Bilimoria, Yaoming Liu, Jennifer L. Paruch et al. · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2013 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Dimitris Bertsimas, Jack Dunn · Machine Learning · 2017 · 632 citations · Full text