Heliyon · 2021 · 21 citations · 50 references
AgricultureAgronomyCrop SciencesConservation TillageCrop ProductionWater ConservationAgricultural Water ConservationRainfed Crop ProductionSoil Fertility EvaluationSoil-water ManagementTillage ManagementTillage SystemsAgronomic Water Use EfficiencyConservation Tillage SystemsNo-till AgricultureRainfed ProductionSoil Water ConservationTillage Effects On Soil WaterTillage Effects On YieldWater Use Efficiency Improvement
< 0.05) affected the water use efficiency, with water use efficiency values generally higher under no-tillage and stubble-mulching than under deep tillage and conventional tillage treatments. The grain yield was highest under no-tillage and stubble-mulching than deep tillage and conventional tillage treatments, with over 5, 38, and 43% higher grain yield under no-tillage than under stubble-mulching, deep tillage, and conventional tillage treatments, respectively. Although no-tillage and stubble-mulching improved soil water storage and grain yield, seasonal precipitation distribution had a greater influence on the final grain yield, soil water storage, and water use efficiency. The net profit was 3 and 5 times higher under no-tillage than under conventional tillage and deep tillage treatments, respectively. The overall results showed that no-tillage and stubble-mulching were the optimum tillage treatments for increasing soil water storage and common bean yield, enhancing water use efficiency, and improving economic returns in central Uganda.
50
Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know?
John M. Baker, Tyson E. Ochsner, Rodney T. Venterea et al. · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · 2006 · 1.2K citations
José O. Payero, David D. Tarkalson, Suat Irmak et al. · Agricultural Water Management · 2008 · 317 citations
Agriculture, Agronomy, Crop Sciences +17
Eduardo E. Martínez, Juan Pablo Fuentes, Paola Silva et al. · Soil and Tillage Research · 2008 · 271 citations · Full text
Agriculture, Agronomy, Soil Sciences +17