Head & Face Medicine · 2021 · 12 citations · 15 references
DentistryMaxillofacial SurgerySurgeryMaxillofacial TraumaReconstructive SurgerySurgical Anatomy Of The HeadLe Fort FracturesMaxillofacial ReconstructionMidface FracturesMidface ReconstructionThree-dimensional ReconstructionZygomaticomaxillary Complex FracturesFracturesLe Fort Fracture ReconstructionLe Fort Ii FractureLe Fort Iii FractureMidface Fracture ReconstructionReference Points AssessmentShape Model ValidationStatistical Shape Analysis
BACKGROUND: Complex bilateral midface fractures necessitate a surgically challenging procedure to preserve or restore the occlusion and the sensitive eye area. In this case control study, we aim to show the potential of a statistical shape model (SSM) for measuring the quality of the midface reconstruction, compared to the estimated preoperative situation. METHODS: An individualized SSM was postoperatively registered on 19 reconstructed complex bilateral midface fractures. Using this SSM, the distances from the simulated preoperative situation to the postoperative positions of the fracture segments were calculated. The fracture lines for Le Fort II, Le Fort III, and NOE fractures were chosen as reference points for the distance measurements. RESULTS: The SSM could be registered on all 19 complex bilateral midface fractures. All analyzed fractures showed a dorsal impaction (negative values) of the midface. Le Fort II fractures showed deviation values of -0.98 ± 4.6 mm, Le Fort III fractures showed values of -3.68 ± 3.6 mm, NOE type 2 fractures showed values of -0.25 ± 4.6 mm, and NOE type 1 fractures showed values of -0.25 ± 4.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The SSM can be used to measure the quality of the achieved reduction of complex bilateral midface fractures based on the estimated preoperative situation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00009719.
15
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · 2020 · 811 citations · Full text