SAR and QSAR in environmental research · 2021 · 22 citations · 39 references
Natural SciencesChemistryComputational ChemistryDrug DiscoveryTheoretical ChemistryMolecular ModelingMolecular Property PredictionQuantitative Structure-activity RelationshipsReaction MechanismsVirtual ScreeningCross-validationK-fold Cross-validationPredictive Model PerformancePredictive PerformancePredictive Performance EvaluationQuantitative Structure - Property Relationship ModelingQuantitative Structure-property Relationship ModelsRate Constants
In this article, we consider cross-validation of the quantitative structure-property relationship models for reactions and show that the conventional k-fold cross-validation (CV) procedure gives an 'optimistically' biased assessment of prediction performance. To address this issue, we suggest two strategies of model cross-validation, 'transformation-out' CV, and 'solvent-out' CV. Unlike the conventional k-fold cross-validation approach that does not consider the nature of objects, the proposed procedures provide an unbiased estimation of the predictive performance of the models for novel types of structural transformations in chemical reactions and reactions going under new conditions. Both the suggested strategies have been applied to predict the rate constants of bimolecular elimination and nucleophilic substitution reactions, and Diels-Alder cycloaddition. All suggested cross-validation methodologies and tutorial are implemented in the open-source software package CIMtools (https://github.com/cimm-kzn/CIMtools).
39
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Fabián Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 63.7K citations · Full text
Alexander Golbraikh, Alexander Tropsha · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · 2002 · 3.7K citations
Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external
Paola Gramatica · QSAR & Combinatorial Science · 2007 · 2.2K citations · Full text