ESMO Open · 2021 · 17 citations · 19 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyChemotherapyOncology PharmacotherapyChemotherapy Toxicity ManagementCombination ChemotherapyDose Adjustment In OncologyDose SchedulingLung Cancer PharmacotherapyToxicity ManagementChemotherapy Dose-limiting ToxicityFixed-dose DosingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer PalliationNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TherapyNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TreatmentOral Chemotherapy SafetyPlatinum-based CombinationsPlatinum-based Regimens
•First-line oral vinorelbine prolonged PFS without grade 4 toxicity in platinum-unfit patients with advanced NSCLC.•Metronomic oral vinorelbine is associated with a clear reduction of grade 3-4 toxicities (mainly hematological ones).•Metronomic oral vinorelbine allows home treatment and easy tailoring of the treatment according to patient tolerance. BackgroundTo assess the efficacy and safety of a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine (mVNR) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients unfit for platinum-based combination chemotherapy.Patients and methodsThis was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label phase II study in treatment-naive patients with TNM stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Patients received mVNR at a fixed dose of 50 mg × 3 or standard schedule 60-80 mg/m2 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) without grade 4 toxicity (G4PFS; NCI-CTC v4). Main secondary objectives were safety, disease control rate (DCR) without grade 4 toxicity (G4DCR), DCR, PFS, overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL).ResultsA total of 167 patients were included, 83 and 84 patients in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. The median G4PFS was 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6-4.3] and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.5-2.9), hazard ration (HR) = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45-0.88), P = 0.0068 in favor of metronomic arm; G4DCR was 45.8% and 26.8% in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the mVNR arm (25.3% versus 54.4%) mainly owing to a reduction in all grades (15.7% versus 51.9%) and grade 3-4 neutropenia (10.8% versus 42%). PFS was 4.3 (95% CI: 3.3-5.1) and 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-5.2) in mVNR and standard arms, respectively. No difference in median OS was observed. QoL was comparable between arms.ConclusionsMetronomic oral vinorelbine significantly prolonged median G4PFS in advanced NSCLC patients unfit for platinum combinations as first-line treatment. It was associated with a clear reduction in toxicity and may be considered as an important option in this challenging population. To assess the efficacy and safety of a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine (mVNR) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients unfit for platinum-based combination chemotherapy. This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label phase II study in treatment-naive patients with TNM stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Patients received mVNR at a fixed dose of 50 mg × 3 or standard schedule 60-80 mg/m2 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) without grade 4 toxicity (G4PFS; NCI-CTC v4). Main secondary objectives were safety, disease control rate (DCR) without grade 4 toxicity (G4DCR), DCR, PFS, overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). A total of 167 patients were included, 83 and 84 patients in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. The median G4PFS was 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6-4.3] and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.5-2.9), hazard ration (HR) = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45-0.88), P = 0.0068 in favor of metronomic arm; G4DCR was 45.8% and 26.8% in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the mVNR arm (25.3% versus 54.4%) mainly owing to a reduction in all grades (15.7% versus 51.9%) and grade 3-4 neutropenia (10.8% versus 42%). PFS was 4.3 (95% CI: 3.3-5.1) and 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-5.2) in mVNR and standard arms, respectively. No difference in median OS was observed. QoL was comparable between arms. Metronomic oral vinorelbine significantly prolonged median G4PFS in advanced NSCLC patients unfit for platinum combinations as first-line treatment. It was associated with a clear reduction in toxicity and may be considered as an important option in this challenging population.
19
3rd ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3)
Fátima Cardoso, A. Costa, Elżbieta Senkus et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2016 · 2.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Breast Oncology +11
5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5)
Fátima Cardoso, Shani Paluch–Shimon, Elżbieta Senkus et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2020 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Yuval Shaked, Urban Emmenegger, Shan Man et al. · Blood · 2005 · 256 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +14