Clinical Rehabilitation · 2021 · 16 citations · 22 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryOrthotic TherapyOrthoticsRheumatologyArthritis RehabilitationFoot OrthosesLower Extremity Function AssessmentLower Extremity RehabilitationLower Limb OrthosesRheumatoid ArthritisControl Group DesignDisease DurationFoot Function AssessmentMatched Control GroupOutcome Evaluation Of OrthosesRandomized Controlled Trial BaselineRheumatoid Arthritis OrthosesRheumatoid Foot Orthoses
Objectives: To compare balance, foot function and mobility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with and without foot orthoses. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient rheumatology clinic. Subjects: A total of 94 subjects with rheumatoid arthritis were randomized; of these, 81 were included in the analyses (Intervention group: 40; Control group: 41). Intervention: The Intervention Group received custom-made foot orthoses while the Control Group received none intervention. Main measure: The “Foot Function Index,” the “Berg Balance Scale,” and the “Timed-up-and-go Test” were assessed at baseline an after four weeks. The chosen level of significance was P < 0.05. Results: Average (standard deviation) participant age was 56.7 (±10.6) years old and average disease duration (standard deviation) was 11.4 (± 7.2) years. Groups were similar at baseline, except for comorbidity index and race. After four weeks, significant interaction group versus time was observed for Foot Function Index (change: Intervention group: −1.23 ± 1.58; Control group: −0.12 ± 1.16 – P = 0.0012) and for Berg Balance Scale (change: Intervention group: 2 ± 3; Control group: 0 ± 3 – P = 0.0110), but not for the Timed-up-and-go Test (change: Intervention group: −1.34 ± 1.99; Control group: −0.84 ± 2.29 – P = 0.0799). Conclusion: Foot orthoses improved foot function and balance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
22