IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · 2021 · 212 citations · 108 references
ComputingComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceComputer SecurityCritical Infrastructure ProtectionMachine LearningIndustrial Control Systems SecurityIndustrial Network SecurityIntrusion DetectionThreat AnalysisThreat DetectionBenchmark DatasetsIndustrial Control SystemsIndustrial Control Systems Security TestingLegacy SystemsMachine Learning For Intrusion DetectionSecurity MechanismsSystem Architecture DesignVulnerability
The increasing digitization and interconnection of legacy Industrial Control Systems (ICSs) open new vulnerability surfaces, exposing such systems to malicious attackers. Furthermore, since ICSs are often employed in critical infrastructures (e.g., nuclear plants) and manufacturing companies (e.g., chemical industries), attacks can lead to devastating physical damages. In dealing with this security requirement, the research community focuses on developing new security mechanisms such as Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs), facilitated by leveraging modern machine learning techniques. However, these algorithms require a testing platform and a considerable amount of data to be trained and tested accurately. To satisfy this prerequisite, Academia, Industry, and Government are increasingly proposing testbed (i.e., scaled-down versions of ICSs or simulations) to test the performances of the IDSs. Furthermore, to enable researchers to cross-validate security systems (e.g., security-by-design concepts or anomaly detectors), several datasets have been collected from testbeds and shared with the community. In this paper, we provide a deep and comprehensive overview of ICSs, presenting the architecture design, the employed devices, and the security protocols implemented. We then collect, compare, and describe testbeds and datasets in the literature, highlighting key challenges and design guidelines to keep in mind in the design phases. Furthermore, we enrich our work by reporting the best performing IDS algorithms tested on every dataset to create a baseline in state of the art for this field. Finally, driven by knowledge accumulated during this survey’s development, we report advice and good practices on the development, the choice, and the utilization of testbeds, datasets, and IDSs.
108
Seyedali Mirjalili, Seyed Mohammad Mirjalili, Seyed Mohammad Mirjalili et al. · Advances in Engineering Software · 2014 · 18.4K citations · Full text
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Mahbod Tavallaee, Ebrahim Bagheri, Wei Lu et al. · 2009 · 4.8K citations · Full text