Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2021 · 32 citations · 27 references
MedicineMaternal HealthObstetricsMaternal-fetal MedicineNeonatal HealthPreterm BirthFetal Growth AssessmentFetal OutcomesNeonatal OutcomesPrediction Of Preterm BirthPregnancyTwin StudiesBirth Weight AssessmentBirth Weight RecordingFetal Growth ChartsFetal Weight EstimationGestational Age MeasurementHypertension In Twin PregnancyNeonatal Outcomes AssessmentPerinatal Complications
Twin pregnancies are commonly assessed using singleton growth and birth weight reference charts. This practice has led to a significant number of twins labelled as small for gestational age (SGA), causing unnecessary interventions and increased risk of iatrogenic preterm birth. However, the use of twin-specific charts remains controversial. This study aims to assess whether twin-specific estimated fetal weight (EFW) and birth weight (BW) charts are more predictive of adverse outcomes compared to singleton charts. Centiles of EFW and BW were calculated using previously published singleton and twin charts. Categorical data were compared using Chi-square or McNemar tests. The study included 1740 twin pregnancies, with the following perinatal adverse outcomes recorded: perinatal death, preterm birth <34 weeks, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and admissions to the neonatal unit (NNU). Twin-specific charts identified prenatally and postnatally a smaller proportion of infants as SGA compared to singleton charts. However, twin charts showed a higher percentage of adverse neonatal outcomes in SGA infants than singleton charts. For example, perinatal death (SGA 7.2% vs. appropriate for gestational age (AGA) 2%, p < 0.0001), preterm birth <34 weeks (SGA 42.1% vs. AGA 16.4%, p < 0.0001), HDP (SGA 21.2% vs. AGA 13.5%, p = 0.015) and NNU admissions (SGA 69% vs. AGA 24%, p < 0.0001), when compared to singleton charts (perinatal death: SGA 2% vs. AGA 1%, p = 0.029), preterm birth <34 weeks: (SGA 20.6% vs. AGA 17.4%, p = 0.020), NNU admission: (SGA 34.5% vs. AGA 23.9%, p < 0.000). There was no significant association between HDP and SGA using the singleton charts (p = 0.696). In SGA infants, according to the twin charts, the incidence of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler was significantly more common than in SGA using the singleton chart (27.0% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, singleton charts misclassify a large number of twins as at risk of fetal growth restriction. The evidence suggests that the following twin-specific charts could reduce unnecessary medical interventions prenatally and postnatally.
27
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy
Asma Khalil, M. T. Rodgers, Ahmet Baschat et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2015 · 648 citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Obstetrics +14
An adjustable fetal weight standard
Jason Gardosi, M. Mongelli, Matthew Wilcox et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 1995 · 574 citations
Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts
K. H. Nicolaides, D. Wright, Argyro Syngelaki et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2018 · 350 citations · Full text