Publication | Closed Access
Judicial Risk and Credit Market Performance: Micro Evidence from Brazilian Payroll Loans
18
Citations
0
References
2006
Year
LawBankruptcyFinancial RegulationFinancializationMonetary PolicyInternational FinanceManagementFinancial IntermediationBrazilian Payroll LoansMicro EvidenceJudicial RiskSovereign DebtEconomicsPayroll DeductionPayroll LoansCredit MarketLoansFinanceBusinessEmpirical EvidenceFinancingFinancial Crisis
A large body of literature has stressed the institution-development nexus as critical in explaining differences in countries%u2019 economic performance. The empirical evidence, however, has been mainly at the aggregate level, associating macro performance with measures of quality of institutions. This paper, by relating a judicial decision on the legality of payroll loans in Brazil to bank-level decision variables, provides micro evidence on how creditor legal protection affects market performance. Payroll loans are personal loans with principal and interests payments directly deducted from the borrowers%u2019 payroll check, which, in practice, makes a collateral out of future income. In June 2004, a high-level federal court upheld a regional court ruling that had declared payroll deduction illegal. Using personal loans without payroll deduction as a control group, we assess whether the ruling had an impact on market performance. Evidence indicates that it had an adverse impact on risk perception, interest rates, and amount lent.