What is a market? A Wittgensteinian exercise

Colette Depeyre, Hervé Dumez

European Management Review · 2008 · 25 citations · 19 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Markets are studied both practically by firms and theoretically by disciplines such as economics and sociology, yet the concept remains contested. This paper investigates the notion of market through a Wittgensteinian lens, using an extreme case to expose differing language‑games and the idea of market families rather than a single definition. The authors analyze the American defense industry as an extreme case, examining its regulation, financial investment, and strategic games as distinct language‑games that together constitute a market. They find that markets form families identified by shared resemblances and differences, and that viewing them as language‑games illuminates how such families drive innovation.

Abstract

Abstract What is a market? The question is both practical (for firms elaborating their strategy) and theoretical, and various answers have been given by different disciplines, especially economics and sociology. In this paper, we will address the question from a Wittgensteinian perspective: — making use of an extreme case, to unfamiliarize the familiar, or what we think we know on markets; — considering how different language‐games are played, and how they give different meanings to the notion of market; and — using the notion of ‘family resemblance’ to highlight the fact there is no such thing as ‘the’ market, but families of markets, with resemblances and dissimilarities. The extreme case we have selected is that of the American defense industry. We study three language‐games that constitute this industry as a market: the regulation, the financial investment and the strategic games. We suggest that although there is no single concept of the market, there can be families of markets that can be identified through sets of resemblances and dissimilarities. Finally, we show how the language‐game perspective contributes to understand innovation.

References

19