Concepedia

Abstract

We present commissioning and validation of F red , a graphical processing unit (GPU)–accelerated Monte Carlo code, for two proton beam therapy facilities of different beam line design: CCB (Krakow, IBA) and EMORY (Atlanta, Varian). We followed clinical acceptance tests required to approve the certified treatment planning system for clinical use. We implemented an automated and efficient procedure to build a parameter library characterizing the clinical proton pencil beam. Beam energy, energy spread, lateral propagation model, and a dosimetric calibration factor were parametrized based on measurements performed during the facility start-up. The F red beam model was validated against commissioning and supplementary measurements performed with and without range shifter. We obtained 1) submillimeter agreement of Bragg peak shapes in water and lateral beam profiles in air and slab phantoms, 2) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>%</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> dose agreement for spread out Bragg peaks of different ranges, 3) average gamma index (2%/2 mm) passing rate of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>95</mml:mn><mml:mtext>%</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> patient verification measurements using a two-dimensional array of ionization chambers, and 4) gamma index passing rate of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>99</mml:mn><mml:mtext>%</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math> for three-dimensional dose distributions computed with F red and measured with an array of ionization chambers behind an anthropomorphic phantom. The results of example treatment planning study on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> patients demonstrated that F red simulations in computed tomography enable an accurate prediction of dose distribution in patient and application of F red as second patient quality assurance tool. Computation of a patient treatment in a CT using <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> protons per pencil beam took on average 2′30 min with a tracking rate of 2.9 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math> . F red was successfully commissioned and validated against the clinical beam model, showing that it could potentially be used in clinical routine. Thanks to high computational performance due to GPU acceleration and an automated beam model implementation method, the application of F red is now possible for research or quality assurance purposes in most of the proton facilities.

References

YearCitations

Page 1