Reporting Internal Control Deficiencies in the Post‐Sarbanes‐Oxley Era: The Role of Auditors and Corporate Governance

Gopal V. Krishnan, Gnanakumar Visvanathan

International Journal of Auditing · 2007 · 146 citations · 30 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The paper examines how audit committees and auditors influence reporting of internal control deficiencies after the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act. The analysis controls for firm complexity, profitability, and growth to isolate governance effects. Firms reporting internal control weaknesses tend to hold more audit committee meetings, have fewer financial experts, experience more auditor changes, and have higher rates of prior restatements, underscoring the role of governance beyond firm characteristics.

Abstract

This study addresses the role of audit committees and auditors in the reporting of internal control deficiencies after the passage of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act (SOX). We find that a higher number of meetings of the audit committee, lesser proportion of ‘financial experts’ in the audit committee, and more auditor changes characterize firms that report weaknesses in their internal controls compared to firms with no weaknesses. Prior restatements of financial statements are also higher for firms that report weaknesses in internal controls. These results obtain after controlling for a variety of firm characteristics such as complexity of operations, profitability, and growth. Our results underscore the importance of governance characteristics beyond general firm characteristics in examining the reporting of internal control weaknesses.

References

30