The Journal of Financial Research · 2000 · 12 citations · 15 references
Social SciencesEconomicsFinanceEconometricsFinancial EconomicsPortfolio ManagementAsset AllocationAsset Return ModelingMeasurement ErrorPortfolio AnalyticsPortfolio TheoryRisk-return AnalysisAsset Pricing TestsMarket BetaMean Reversion AnalysisRisk-shifting EffectsSortingStandard Errors Of MeasurementStock Market Returns
Abstract This article demonstrates that the portfolio approach could suffer a serious problem when the sorting variables contain not only true values but also measurement errors. The grouped measurement errors will be embedded into the data used to test financial models and further bias the testing results. To correct for this measurement‐error problem, I develop a random sampling approach to form portfolios. Results from this new methodology are unbiased and robust. By applying this methodology to investigate beta shifts, I show that the previous results about beta shifts are driven by measurement errors. The actual beta shift pattern is more complicated than that predicted by previous studies. The risk shift hypothesis is unlikely to explain the mean‐reversion puzzle for stock returns. JEL classification: Gil, C43.
15
Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife
B. Efron · The Annals of Statistics · 1979 · 17.4K citations · Full text
Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests
Eugene F. Fama, James D. MacBeth · Journal of Political Economy · 1973 · 15.1K citations
Does the Stock Market Overreact?
Werner F. M. De Bondt, Richard H. Thaler · The Journal of Finance · 1985 · 7.2K citations
Permanent and Temporary Components of Stock Prices
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French · Journal of Political Economy · 1988 · 3.1K citations
Estimating betas from nonsynchronous data
Myron S. Scholes, Joseph Williams · Journal of Financial Economics · 1977 · 2.8K citations