Publication | Closed Access
Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence
1.5K
Citations
15
References
2003
Year
AuditingAuditor FeesContinuous AuditingFirm PerformanceEarnings Benchmark TestsAccountingAccounting PracticeBusinessAudit RegulationAudit QualityAccounting AuditAudit OversightFinancial AccountingFinanceFurther EvidenceAudit Market Structure
Previous research by Frankel et al. (2002) examined auditor independence. The study aims to contest Frankel et al.’s conclusions about auditor independence.
This paper challenges the findings of Frankel et al. (2002) (FJN). The results of our discretionary accruals tests differ from FJN's when we adjust discretionary current accruals for firm performance. In our earnings benchmark tests, in contrast to FJN we find no statistically significant association between firms meeting analyst forecasts and auditor fees. Our market reaction tests also provide different results than those reported by FJN. Overall, our study indicates that FJN's results are sensitive to research design choices, and we find no systematic evidence supporting their claim that auditors violate their independence as a result of clients purchasing relatively more nonaudit services.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1