Contemporary Accounting Research · 2005 · 100 citations · 33 references
Industry SpecializationContinuous AuditingFirm PerformanceD IntensityAuditingAudit Fee PremiumsAudit QualityAudit Market StructureAccountingGeneral BusinessAudit OversightFinanceBrand Name ReputationsClient PressureAccounting PolicyBusinessAudit RegulationAccounting AuditCorporate Finance
Abstract The audit fee research literature argues that auditors' costs of developing brand name reputations, including top‐tier designation and recognition for industry specialization, are compensated through audit fee premiums. Audited firms reduce agency costs by engaging high‐quality auditors who monitor the levels and reporting of discretionary expenditures and accruals. In this study we examine whether specialist auditor choice is associated with a particular discretionary expenditure ‐ research and development (R&D). For a large sample of U.S. companies from a range of industries, we find strong evidence that R&D intensity is positively associated with firms' choices of auditors who specialize in auditing R&D contracts. Additionally, we find that R&D intensive firms tend to appoint top‐tier auditors. We use simultaneous equations to control for interrelationships between dependent variables in addition to single‐equation ordinary least squares (OLS) and logistic regression models. Our results are particularly strong in tests using samples of small firms whose auditor choice is not constrained by the need to appoint a top‐tier auditor to ensure the auditor's financial independence from the client.
33
Determinants of corporate borrowing
Stewart C. Myers · Journal of Financial Economics · 1977 · 13.2K citations
Auditor size and audit quality
Linda DeAngelo · Journal of Accounting and Economics · 1981 · 5.8K citations