Collateral Consequences in the<scp>A</scp>merican States*

Abstract

Objective This article seeks to analyze varying collateral‐consequences policies—laws restricting the rights and privileges of people who have had contact with the criminal‐justice system, particularly those with conviction records—in the A merican states. Methods State policies in eight areas are examined, coded, and combined into an eight‐point scale, which then serves as the dependent variable for a regression analysis. The analysis models such restrictions as products of ideological and partisan, racial, and criminal‐justice‐based predictors. Results Neither D emocratic P arty influence nor crime levels appear to influence significantly state collateral‐sanctions levels; more liberal citizen ideology predicts slightly more lenient policies, while harsher restrictions accompany rising state incarceration rates. Racial variables press in opposite directions: within the model, scores rise as a state's black population increases, but fall as the percentage of African Americans in the state legislature rises. Conclusion Formally creatures of civil rather than criminal law, these “collateral” restrictions appear to possess important affinities with other punitive policies in the U nited S tates, yet also resist unambiguous linkage to ideological, criminal‐justice, and racial predictors.