Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2021 · 13 citations · 20 references
MedicineGynecologyPathologyGynecologic UltrasoundUltrasonographyUltrasoundElastographyEndometrial CancerTransvaginal UltrasonographyUterine PathologyUterine UltrasonographyUterine UltrasoundAtypical Endometrial HyperplasiaEndometrial Cancer DetectionEndometrial Cancer Risk StratificationEndometrial Hyperplasia AssessmentEndometrial Hyperplasia DetectionEndometrial Hyperplasia DiagnosisEndometrial Pathology EvaluationShear Wave Imaging
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate shear wave elastography (SWE) technology diagnosis value of endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), and to establish predictive logistic regression models for the diagnosis of EC and AEH. METHODS: Clinical information collection, transvaginal conventional ultrasonography, and SWE check were performed on 122 patients, who were perimenopausal or postmenopausal vaginal bleeding with ≥4.5 mm thick endometrium. The maximal (Emax) and mean (Emean) of Young's modulus for the endometrium were obtained. Using pathology as the gold standard, ROC curves were plotted to evaluate Young's modulus on the diagnostic effectiveness of EC and AEH. Single-factor analysis and bivariate logistic regression methods were applied to assess the clinical variables, transuaginal conventional ultrasonography variables, and Young's modulus on the identification of EC and AEH. RESULTS: Out of 122 cases of endometrial lesions, 85 cases were benign lesions, and the remaining 37 cases were EC and AEH. The Emax and Emean for the benign group were 29.80 ± 11.40 and 17.96 ± 8.05 kPa, respectively. The Emax and Emean values for EC and AEH group were 59.49 ± 16.95 and 38.46 ± 17.10 kPa, respectively. Emax and Emean for both groups were statistically significant, with p <.001. In the logistical regression analysis, endometrial thickness, Color score, and Young's modulus were identified as independent risk factors for EC and AEH. CONCLUSIONS: SWE technology plays an important role in the diagnosis of EC and AEH, and the diagnostic effectiveness would be higher when combined with conventional ultrasonography.
20
Monica Hagan Vetter, Blair Smith, Jason Benedict et al. · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2019 · 117 citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Surgery +15
E. Epstein, D. Fischerová, L. Valentin et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2017 · 115 citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Oncology +10
E. Epstein, L. Skoog, Per‐Erik Isberg et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2002 · 101 citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Oncology +17
Real‐time elastography for assessment of uterine disorders
B. Stoelinga, Wouter J.K. Hehenkamp, Hans A.M. Brölmann et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2013 · 94 citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Pathology +17