Journal of Women s Health · 2021 · 70 citations · 21 references
ComputingBiomedical InformaticsInfectious DiseasesClinical InformaticsElectronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingClinical Natural Language ProcessingDisease ManagementElectronic Health Record AnalyticsElectronic Health Record PhenotypingSeverity Of Illness DocumentationSex Differences In HealthCoronavirus DiagnosticsDisease Onset PredictionDisease Onset TimingGender Differences In HealthGender Differences In MortalitySex Differences In EpidemiologySex-specific EpidemiologySex-specific Risk Prediction
Background: The impact of sex and gender in the incidence and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains controversial. Here, we aim to describe the characteristics of COVID-19 patients at disease onset, with special focus on the diagnosis and management of female patients with COVID-19. Methods: We explored the unstructured free text in the electronic health records (EHRs) within the SESCAM Healthcare Network (Castilla La-Mancha, Spain). The study sample comprised the entire population with available EHRs (1,446,452 patients) from January 1st to May 1st, 2020. We extracted patients' clinical information upon diagnosis, progression, and outcome for all COVID-19 cases. Results: A total of 4,780 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were identified. Of these, 2,443 (51%) were female, who were on average 1.5 years younger than male patients (61.7 ± 19.4 vs. 63.3 ± 18.3, p = 0.0025). There were more female COVID-19 cases in the 15–59-year-old interval, with the greatest sex ratio (95% confidence interval) observed in the 30–39-year-old range (1.69; 1.35–2.11). Upon diagnosis, headache, anosmia, and ageusia were significantly more frequent in females than males. Imaging by chest X-ray or blood tests were performed less frequently in females (65.5% vs. 78.3% and 49.5% vs. 63.7%, respectively), all p < 0.001. Regarding hospital resource use, females showed less frequency of hospitalization (44.3% vs. 62.0%) and intensive care unit admission (2.8% vs. 6.3%) than males, all p < 0.001. Conclusion: Our results indicate important sex-dependent differences in the diagnosis, clinical manifestation, and treatment of patients with COVID-19. These results warrant further research to identify and close the gender gap in the ongoing pandemic.
21
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2007 · 21.6K citations · Full text
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Epidemiologic Methods +10
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2008 · 16.4K citations · Full text
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Epidemiologic Methods +10
Somatic symptom reporting in women and men
Arthur J. Barsky, Heli M. Peekna, Jonathan F. Borus · Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2001 · 791 citations
Nursing, Psychiatry, Psychology +12
Women and Health: the key for sustainable development
The Lancet · 2015 · 432 citations