Publication | Open Access
Digital Phenotyping and Digital Psychotropic Drugs: Mental Health Surveillance Tools That Threaten Human Rights.
14
Citations
16
References
2020
Year
Mental Health SurveillancePsychopathologyPsychiatric EvaluationDigital TherapeuticsMental Health ApplicationsDrug PolicyDigital Psychotropic DrugsMental HealthDigital InterventionPsychologyDigital PhenotypingMental Health AppsDigital HealthPublic HealthTelehealthDigital Mental HealthPsychiatryHealth PolicyEhealthHealth Information TechnologySubstance AbuseMental Health MonitoringMedical PrivacyMobile HealthMedicineHealth Informatics
Digital technologies and tools hold much promise. Indeed, the COVID-19 pandemic has shown us how helpful telehealth platforms and mental health applications (apps) can be in a time of quarantine and social distancing. However, such technologies also pose risks to human rights at both the individual and population levels. For example, there are concerns not just about privacy but also about the agency and autonomy of the person using mental health apps. In this paper, we describe what phenotyping is, how it is used to predict mood, and why we ought to exercise caution before embracing it as a means of mental health surveillance. We also discuss the United States' recent regulatory approval of the first-ever digital drug, an antipsychotic (aripiprazole) embedded with a sensor. Digital aripiprazole was developed in order to increase medication compliance, but we argue that it may undermine a rights-based approach in the mental health field by reinforcing coercive practices and power imbalances. The global dissemination and promotion of these apps raise human rights concerns.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1