PubMed · 1990 · 13 citations · 35 references
Life SciencesDermatologyImmunologyAllergyHypersensitivityInsect PathologyAllergic ConditionsAnaphylaxisInsect Sting AllergyPatch TestingType I HypersensitivityVenom AllergyExtractFire Ant AllergyIntradermal Skin TestingSkin Test InterpretationVenom Allergen TestingVenom AllergensVenom Allergy DiagnosisVenom Allergy Testing
The specificities and sensitivities of skin test reactivity to imported fire ant (IFA) whole body extract (WBE) and IFA venom were compared with IFA WBE RAST and IFA venom RAST in the diagnosis of IFA allergy. Study groups consisted of 18 IFA allergic patients and 21 control subjects with no history of allergy to insect stings. All IFA allergic patients had positive skin tests to both IFA WBE and IFA venom. Six of 21 (29%) control subjects also had positive skin tests to both IFA WBE and IFA venom. A commercial IFA WBE RAST was positive in 10 of 18 (56%) IFA-allergic patients and 2 of 21 (10%) control subjects. Imported fire ant aqueous venom RAST was positive in 11 of 11 (100%) IFA-allergic patients and three of ten (30%) control subjects. Vespa IFA venom RAST was positive in 16 of 18 (89%) IFA-allergic patients and 5 of 21 (24%) controls. The sensitivities and specificities of IFA WBE skin testing, IFA venom skin testing, and IFA venom RAST did not differ significantly. Imported fire ant WBE RAST was less sensitive than the other diagnostic methods.
35
Protocol for the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease
Vernice Jackson‐Lewis, Serge Przedborski · Nature Protocols · 2007 · 1.1K citations
Colm Cunningham, David Wilcockson, Suzanne Campion et al. · Journal of Neuroscience · 2005 · 772 citations · Full text