Generating high-fidelity synthetic patient data for assessing machine learning healthcare software

Allan Tucker, Zhenchen Wang, Ylenia Rotalinti, Puja Myles

npj Digital Medicine · 2020 · 225 citations · 38 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The growing adoption of AI in healthcare relies on historical patient data, yet privacy concerns hinder its broader use, prompting interest in realistic synthetic datasets that preserve complex data characteristics without containing real patient information. The study aims to generate realistic synthetic UK primary‑care patient data by integrating resampling, probabilistic graphical modeling, latent variable identification, and outlier analysis. The authors address missingness and complex variable interactions, and evaluate re‑identification risk by applying sensitivity analysis to machine‑learning classifiers on the synthetic data. The synthetic datasets closely match the original data in feature distributions, dependencies, and classifier sensitivity, while posing a low risk of re‑identification.

Abstract

There is a growing demand for the uptake of modern artificial intelligence technologies within healthcare systems. Many of these technologies exploit historical patient health data to build powerful predictive models that can be used to improve diagnosis and understanding of disease. However, there are many issues concerning patient privacy that need to be accounted for in order to enable this data to be better harnessed by all sectors. One approach that could offer a method of circumventing privacy issues is the creation of realistic synthetic data sets that capture as many of the complexities of the original data set (distributions, non-linear relationships, and noise) but that does not actually include any real patient data. While previous research has explored models for generating synthetic data sets, here we explore the integration of resampling, probabilistic graphical modelling, latent variable identification, and outlier analysis for producing realistic synthetic data based on UK primary care patient data. In particular, we focus on handling missingness, complex interactions between variables, and the resulting sensitivity analysis statistics from machine learning classifiers, while quantifying the risks of patient re-identification from synthetic datapoints. We show that, through our approach of integrating outlier analysis with graphical modelling and resampling, we can achieve synthetic data sets that are not significantly different from original ground truth data in terms of feature distributions, feature dependencies, and sensitivity analysis statistics when inferring machine learning classifiers. What is more, the risk of generating synthetic data that is identical or very similar to real patients is shown to be low.

References

38