Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal · 2020 · 16 citations · 25 references
MedicinePediatricsGood Clinical PracticeMedical EthicsNeonatologyClinical Trial Protocol ReviewClinical TrialsConsentNeonatal EthicsParent InvolvementComparative Clinical EffectivenessComparative Clinical TrialsComparative Effectiveness TrialsOpt-in ConsentOpt-out ConsentParental ConsentParental Informed ConsentQualitative Interviewing
BACKGROUND: More effective recruitment strategies like alternative approaches to consent are needed to facilitate adequately powered trials. Witholding Enteral feeds Around Transfusion was a multicentre, randomised, pilot trial that compared withholding and continuing feeds around transfusion. The primary clinical outcome was necrotising enterocolitis. The trial used simplified opt-out consent with concise parent information and no consent form. OBJECTIVE: To explore the views and experiences of parents and health professionals on the acceptability and feasibility of opt-out consent in randomised comparative effectiveness trials. METHODS: A qualitative, descriptive interview-based study nested within a randomised trial. Semistructured interview transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. SETTING: Eleven neonatal units in England. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven parents and ten health professionals with experience of simplified consent. RESULTS: Five themes emerged: 'opt-out consent operationalised as verbal opt-in consent', 'opt-out consent normalises participation while preserving parental choice', 'opt-out consent as an ongoing process of informed choice', 'consent without a consent form' and 'choosing to opt out of a comparative effectiveness trial', with two subthemes: 'wanting "normal care"' and 'a belief that feeding is better'. CONCLUSION: Introducing a novel form of consent proved challenging in practice. The principle of a simplified, opt-out approach to consent was generally considered feasible and acceptable by health professionals for a neonatal comparative effectiveness trial. The priority for parents was having the right to decide about trial participation, and they did not see opt-out consent as undermining this. Describing a study as 'opt-out' can help to normalise participation and emphasise that parents can withdraw consent.
25
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke · Qualitative Research in Psychology · 2006 · 183.3K citations · Full text
Social Sciences, Psychology, Communication Research Methods +10
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization
Benjamin Saunders, Julius Sim, Tom Kingstone et al. · Quality & Quantity · 2017 · 11.6K citations · Full text