Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Effects of Promoters on the Structure, Performance, and Carbon Deposition of Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Catalysts for CO<sub>2</sub>–CH<sub>4</sub> Reforming

46

Citations

59

References

2021

Year

Abstract

Modified Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalysts with Ca, Co, and Ce species as promoters were prepared by the combustion method, and the structure, morphology, reduction characteristic, and CO<sub>2</sub>-CH<sub>4</sub> reforming of the catalysts were discussed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), H<sub>2</sub>-temperature-programmed reduction (H<sub>2</sub>-TPR), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping, NH<sub>3</sub>-temperature-programmed desorption (NH<sub>3</sub>-TPD), N<sub>2</sub> adsorption-desorption, thermogravimetric-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTG), and temperature-programmed hydrogenation (TPH) methods. The crystal size of Ni on Ca-Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> was 16.97 nm, and the active component and additive were distributed well in the catalyst. Co-Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> presented a surface area of 65.70 m<sup>2</sup>·g<sup>-1</sup> and a pore diameter of 161.60 nm. Ce-Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> showed relatively stable nickel-aluminum spinel (NiAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>), which could not be easily reduced to the active component Ni. Evaluation results demonstrated that the performance of the catalysts followed the order Co-Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> > Ca-Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> > Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> > Ce-Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. Carbon deposition analysis showed that the carbon resistance of Ca-Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> was poor and graphitic carbon was generated on the catalyst. However, Ce-Ni-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> showed less carbon deposition, which might have resulted from the lower activity of the catalyst.

References

YearCitations

Page 1