The American Journal of Bioethics · 2020 · 400 citations · 30 references
ComputingBiomedical InformaticsHealth InformaticsEthicsMachine LearningMedical EthicsAlgorithmic FairnessEthical AssessmentEthics Of Automated Decision-makingHealth Information EthicsHealthcare EthicsMedical Technology AssessmentEthical Technology AssessmentHealth Ai GovernanceHealth Data EthicsImplementation EthicsMachine Learning EthicsMachine Learning For HealthcareOversightSystematic Literature Review
Along with potential benefits to healthcare delivery, machine learning healthcare applications (ML-HCAs) raise a number of ethical concerns. Ethical evaluations of ML-HCAs will need to structure the overall problem of evaluating these technologies, especially for a diverse group of stakeholders. This paper outlines a systematic approach to identifying ML-HCA ethical concerns, starting with a conceptual model of the pipeline of the conception, development, implementation of ML-HCAs, and the parallel pipeline of evaluation and oversight tasks at each stage. Over this model, we layer key questions that raise value-based issues, along with ethical considerations identified in large part by a literature review, but also identifying some ethical considerations that have yet to receive attention. This pipeline model framework will be useful for systematic ethical appraisals of ML-HCA from development through implementation, and for interdisciplinary collaboration of diverse stakeholders that will be required to understand and subsequently manage the ethical implications of ML-HCAs.
30
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Horst W. J. Rittel, Melvin M. Webber · Policy Sciences · 1973 · 15.3K citations · Full text
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Ziad Obermeyer, Brian W. Powers, Christine Vogeli et al. · Science · 2019 · 6.1K citations · Full text
Public Health, Health Care Management, Health Informatics +17