EJNMMI Research · 2020 · 33 citations · 16 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyGynecologic OncologyCancer DiagnosisGynecologic ImagingOvarian CancerPositron Emission TomographyTumor CharacterizationTumor DetectionGynecologic Oncologic ImagingOncologic Pet ImagingOvarian Cancer MetastasisOvarian Tumor DiagnosisOvarian Tumor StagingPrimary Tumor AssessmentPrimary Tumor CharacterizationPrimary Tumor Extent
Abstract Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic potential of PET/MRI with 2-[ 18 F]fluoro-2-deoxy- d -glucose ([ 18 F]FDG) in ovarian cancer. Materials and methods Participants comprised 103 patients with suspected ovarian cancer underwent pretreatment [ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI, contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and pelvic dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (ceMRI). Diagnostic performance of [ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI and ceMRI for assessing the characterization and the extent of the primary tumor (T stage) and [ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI and ceCT for assessing nodal (N stage) and distant (M stage) metastases was evaluated by two experienced readers. Histopathological and follow-up imaging results were used as the gold standard. The McNemar test was employed for statistical analysis. Results Accuracy for the characterization of suspected ovarian cancer was significantly better for [ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI (92.5%) [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84–0.95] than for ceMRI (80.6%) (95% CI 0.72–0.83) ( p < 0.05). Accuracy for T status was 96.4% (95% CI 0.96–0.96) and 92.9% (95% CI 0.93–0.93) for [ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI and ceMRI/ceCT, respectively. Patient-based accuracies for N and M status were 100% (95% CI 0.88–1.00) and 100% (95% CI 0.88–1.00) for [ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI and 85.2% (95% CI 0.76–0.85) and 30.8% (95% CI 0.19–0.31) for ceCT and M staging representing significant differences ( p < 0.01). Lesion-based sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for N status were 78.6% (95% CI 0.57–0.91), 95.7% (95% CI 0.93–0.97) and 93.9% (95% CI 0.89–0.97) for [ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI and 42.9% (95% CI 0.24–0.58), 96.6% (95% CI 0.94–0.98) and 90.8% (95% CI 0.87–0.94) for ceCT. Conclusions [ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI offers better sensitivity and specificity for the characterization and M staging than ceMRI and ceCT, and diagnostic value for T and N staging equivalent to ceMRI and ceCT, suggesting that [ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI might represent a useful diagnostic alternative to conventional imaging modalities in ovarian cancer.
16
Eun Ji Nam, Mijin Yun, Young Taik Oh et al. · Gynecologic Oncology · 2009 · 217 citations · Full text
Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging.
Rosemarie Forstner, Hedvig Hricak, K A Occhipinti et al. · Radiology · 1995 · 206 citations
Ovarian Cancer, Version 3.2012
Robert J. Morgan, Ronald D. Alvarez, Deborah K. Armstrong et al. · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · 2012 · 196 citations
Medicine, Gynecology, Oncology +17