Publication | Open Access
Geophysical Methods and their Applications in Dam Safety Monitoring
38
Citations
23
References
2020
Year
Magnetic ProfilingRock TestingEngineeringDam FoundationGeophysical EngineeringElectromagnetic ProfilingEarth ScienceGeotechnical EngineeringSlope StabilityGeotechnical ProblemGeoenvironmental EngineeringEmbankment DamEarthquake EngineeringStructural Health MonitoringGeophysical MethodsEngineering GeologyRock PropertiesTargeted AnomalySeismologyGeotechnical PropertyCivil EngineeringGeomechanicsRock MechanicsDam Engineering
Geophysical techniques, first applied to earthfill dams in the 1920s, have evolved into versatile, non‑intrusive, rapid, and cost‑effective tools for monitoring dam integrity. This study reviews the range of geophysical methods, their advantages and limitations, and demonstrates their global applicability for dam safety. The methods detect variations in bulk density, moisture, elasticity, resistivity, mineralogy, and magnetic properties, employing techniques such as EM, ERT, SP, GPR, seismic refraction/ reflection, MASW, ReMi, macro‑gravity, and others. These techniques allow early identification of seepage, cracking, voids, and sinkholes, particularly in embankment dams, enabling prompt repair and confirming their widespread usefulness.
The use of geophysical methods in dam sites investigations and safety monitory has proved their good value and versatility in many earthfill dam sites as early as the 1920s. In the following years great development has occurred in the methods, application procedures and tools used. They may be considered today as good ways for carrying out observation tasks on existing dams in non-intrusive and much faster and cheaper ways than the traditional geotechnical methods. It is possible using them to discover anomalies in the dam body or its foundation at an early stage and allowing quick intervention repair works. These methods seek to register and present variations in the basic geotechnical material properties in dams such as; bulk density, moisture content, elasticity, mechanical properties of rocks, electrical resistivity and mineralogy and magnetic properties and so forth. Such variations can indicate increasing seepage flow, progression in cracks’ sizes, formation of voids, caverns and other instability manifestations. Depending on how any investigation is carried out and the targeted anomaly, there is now selection of these methods such as: Electromagnetic Profiling (EM), Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), SelfPotential (SP), Ground Penetration Radar (GPR), variety of Seismic Methods (SM) which can be applied using such equipment as in Seismic refraction, Seismic Reflection, Multi Analysis of Rayleigh surface waves (MASW) instruments, or using Refraction Micrometer (ReMi), macro-gravity method, and Cross-Hole Seismic Tomography. In addition, Temperature Measurements and other less used methods can be used like Microgravity measurement, Magnetic Profiling and Radio Magnetotelluric methods. An attempt is made here to cover the details of these methods, their advantages and limitations and to prove their usefulness in many dam sites all over the world. One observed issue is their adaptability to embankment dams more than to concrete dams and their popularity for checking seepage related problems and material changes within dam bodies and their foundations such as formation of voids and sinkholes.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1