Mitral valve annulus and circumflex artery: In vivo study of anatomical zones

Vincenzo Caruso, Usman Shah, Haytham Sabry, Inderpaul Birdi

JTCVS Techniques · 2020 · 19 citations · 19 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide, with the use of preoperative coronary computed tomography angiography, an in vivo anatomical characterization of the relationship between the circumflex artery and mitral valve annulus to identify different risk classes and to increase the surgical awareness of those anatomical relations. METHODS: Ninety-five (mean age: 64.2 ± 11.7) consecutive patients, initially referred for elective minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, underwent preoperative coronary computed tomography angiography. The distance between the circumflex artery and mitral annulus was assessed using 6 points designed on the posterior mitral annulus, starting from the anterolateral to the posteromedial commissure; this design created an ideal 5-zone system. High-risk anatomy was defined as a distance less than 3 mm between the circumflex artery and the mitral valve annulus. RESULTS: The shortest distance between the circumflex artery and mitral valve annulus was observed at the area between the anterolateral commissure and the midpoint of P1 scallop, so-called zone 1 (5.49 ± 3.13 mm), whereas the longest distance occurred at zone 5 (12.03 ± 4.93). Twenty-four patients (25%) were identified with high-risk anatomy (mean distance 1.94 ± 0.8 mm). Left dominant and co-dominant hearts demonstrated a shorter circumflex artery-mitral valve annulus distance at all the zones. At multinomial logistic regression, the pattern of coronary dominance and the size of the circumflex artery were independent factors for high-risk anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary computed tomography angiography is a useful investigation to identify patients at risk of circumflex artery flow disturbance; for high-risk anatomy, this knowledge may enhance a safer operative technique.

References

19

ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography11“ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Angiography” was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in October 1998 and by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in December 1998.22When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association request that the following format be used: Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, Legako RD, Leon DF, Murray JA, Nissen SD, Pepine CJ, Watson RM. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol1999;33:1756–82433This document is available on the websites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). Reprints of this document (the complete guidelines) are available for $5 each by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. Ask for reprint No. 71-0164. To obtain a reprint of the shorter version (executive summary and summary of recommendations) published in the May 4, 1999, issue of Circulation, ask for reprint No. 71-0163. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342, or e-mail pubauth@heart.org

Patrick J. Scanlon, David P. Faxon, Anne-Marie Audet et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 1999 · 1.1K citations

, , +10