Global Policy · 2020 · 40 citations · 57 references
Biodiversity LossCarbon SequestrationCdr OptionsEngineeringCdr InterventionsBiodiversity ConservationBiodiversity ProtectionEnvironmental ChangeCarbon SinkSlippery SlopeClimate InterventionsCarbon‐dioxide RemovalLand ConservationEmissionsGlobal Change ImpactSocial Sciences
Abstract Carbon‐dioxide removal (CDR) technologies offer the potential to contribute to the restoration and protection of natural ecosystems, the achievement of development goals and the safeguarding of human wellbeing. However, these technologies can also present risks to biodiversity, particularly those techniques that depend on large‐scale manipulation of ecosystems and earth‐system processes. Debates around the development of these technologies have historically focused on the dichotomy between the need to expand the knowledge base on all options related to emerging technologies, and the concern that research represents a slippery slope to deployment. This paper introduces a new approach to governing CDR research – one based on threat identification. We present a framework for assessing the impacts (positive or negative) on biodiversity and ecosystems from a spectrum of CDR interventions, so as to prioritize research to those CDR options that present minimal threats to biodiversity. Application of the framework indicates that while many CDR interventions present threats to biodiversity, certain options, such as regenerative CDR, may have positive impacts.
57
The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services
Edward B. Barbier, Sally D. Hacker, Chris Kennedy et al. · Ecological Monographs · 2010 · 5.3K citations · Full text
Bronson W. Griscom, Justin Adams, Peter W. Ellis et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2017 · 3.2K citations · Full text
Value of Wetlands in Protecting Southeast Louisiana from Hurricane Storm Surges, The
Edward B. Barbier, Ioannis Y. Georgiou, Brian Enchelmeyer et al. · 2011 · 2.1K citations · Full text