Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Emerging models of data governance in the age of datafication

294

Citations

35

References

2020

Year

TLDR

In the platform society, data governance is expanding beyond corporate platforms to include small businesses, public bodies, and civic society, giving rise to four emerging models: data sharing pools, data cooperatives, public data trusts, and personal data sovereignty. The article aims to inform future research on socio‑technical imaginaries for data governance by discussing these models, their principles, and limitations amid the active European policy debate. It proposes a social‑science‑informed conceptualisation of data governance, identifying the four models as functions of stakeholders’ roles, interrelationships, value articulations, governance principles, and competitive struggles. The conceptualisation reveals power dynamics and complex economic and social interactions, underscoring civic society and public bodies as pivotal actors for democratizing data governance and redistributing data‑generated value.

Abstract

The article examines four models of data governance emerging in the current platform society. While major attention is currently given to the dominant model of corporate platforms collecting and economically exploiting massive amounts of personal data, other actors, such as small businesses, public bodies and civic society, take also part in data governance. The article sheds light on four models emerging from the practices of these actors: data sharing pools, data cooperatives, public data trusts and personal data sovereignty. We propose a social science-informed conceptualisation of data governance. Drawing from the notion of data infrastructure we identify the models as a function of the stakeholders’ roles, their interrelationships, articulations of value, and governance principles. Addressing the politics of data, we considered the actors’ competitive struggles for governing data. This conceptualisation brings to the forefront the power relations and multifaceted economic and social interactions within data governance models emerging in an environment mainly dominated by corporate actors. These models highlight that civic society and public bodies are key actors for democratising data governance and redistributing value produced through data. Through the discussion of the models, their underpinning principles and limitations, the article wishes to inform future investigations of socio-technical imaginaries for the governance of data, particularly now that the policy debate around data governance is very active in Europe.

References

YearCitations

Page 1