Frontiers in Medicine · 2020 · 26 citations · 27 references
MedicineClinical SciencesPulmonary Function TestingPulmonologyVentilationAcute Respiratory Distress SyndromeAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome VentilationMechanical VentilationPulmonary MechanicsRespiratory DiseaseVentilator WaveformsLung ComplianceLung Mechanics AssessmentMechanical Ventilation Waveform AnalysisRespiratory Mechanics AssessmentRespiratory Mechanics During DiseaseSpirometryVentilator AsynchronyVentilator-induced Asynchrony
Background: lung mechanics during invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for both prognostic and therapeutic implications; however, the full trajectory lung mechanics has never been described for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring IMV. The study aimed to describe the full trajectory of lung mechanics of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. The clinical and ventilator setting that can influence patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) and compliance were explored. Post-extubation spirometry test was performed to assess the pulmonary function after COVID-19 induced ARDS. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care hospital. All patients with IMV due to COVID-19 induced ARDS were included. High-granularity ventilator waveforms were analyzed with deep learning algorithm to obtain PVAs. Asynchrony index (AI) was calculated as the number of asynchronous events divided by the number of ventilator cycles and wasted efforts. Mortality was recorded as the vital status on hospital discharge. Results: A total of 3,923,450 respiratory cycles in 2,778 hours were analyzed (average: 24 cycles/minute) for 7 patients. Higher plateau pressure (Coefficient: -0.90; 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.78) and neuromuscular blockades (Coefficient: -6.54; 95% CI: -9.92 to -3.16) were associated with lower AI. Survivors showed increasing compliance over time, whereas non-survivors showed persistently low compliance. Recruitment maneuver was not able to improve lung compliance. Patients were on supine position in 1422 hours (51%), followed by prone positioning (499 hours, 18%), left positioning (453 hours, 16%), and right positioning (404 hours, 15%). As compared with supine positioning, prone positioning was associated with 2.31 ml/cmH2O (95% CI: 1.75 to 2.86; p < 0.001) increase in lung compliance. Spirometry tests showed that pulmonary functions were reduced to one third of the predicted values after extubation. Conclusions: The study for the first time described full trajectory of lung mechanics of patients with COVID-19. The result showed that prone positioning was associated with improved compliance; higher plateau pressure and use of neuromuscular blockades were associated with lower risk of AI.
27
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China
Wei‐jie Guan, Zhengyi Ni, Yu Hu et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020 · 31.2K citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine +10
Xiaobo Yang, Yu Yuan, Jiqian Xu et al. · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · 2020 · 10.7K citations · Full text
Yinghui Jin, Lin Cai, Zhenshun Cheng et al. · Military Medical Research · 2020 · 2.4K citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +17
Waleed Alhazzani, Morten Hylander Møller, Yaseen M. Arabi et al. · Intensive Care Medicine · 2020 · 2.2K citations · Full text