IEEE Access · 2020 · 80 citations · 20 references
MedicineRadiologyUrologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyUncertainty QuantificationProstate AnatomyProstate CancerProstate Cancer ImagingProstate ImagingUrologic Cancer DiagnosisAutomatic SegmentationBayesian NetworksBayesian Neural NetworksProstate Cancer DiagnosisProstatic ZonesSegmentationSegmentation Performance AnalysisSegmentation Uncertainty
Automatic segmentation of prostatic zones on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) can improve the diagnostic workflow of prostate cancer. We designed a spatial attentive Bayesian deep learning network for the automatic segmentation of the peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ) of the prostate with uncertainty estimation. The proposed method was evaluated by using internal and external independent testing datasets, and overall uncertainties of the proposed model were calculated at different prostate locations (apex, middle, and base). The study cohort included 351 MRI scans, of which 304 scans were retrieved from a de-identified publicly available datasets (PROSTATEX) and 47 scans were extracted from a large U.S. tertiary referral center (external testing dataset; ETD)). All the PZ and TZ contours were drawn by research fellows under the supervision of expert genitourinary radiologists. Within the PROSTATEX dataset, 259 and 45 patients (internal testing dataset; ITD) were used to develop and validate the model. Then, the model was tested independently using the ETD only. The segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). For PZ and TZ segmentation, the proposed method achieved mean DSCs of 0.80±0.05 and 0.89±0.04 on ITD, as well as 0.79±0.06 and 0.87±0.07 on ETD. For both PZ and TZ, there was no significant difference between ITD and ETD for the proposed method. This DL-based method enabled the accuracy of the PZ and TZ segmentation, which outperformed the state-of-art methods (Deeplab V3+, Attention U-Net, R2U-Net, USE-Net and U-Net). We observed that segmentation uncertainty peaked at the junction between PZ, TZ and AFS. Also, the overall uncertainties were highly consistent with the actual model performance between PZ and TZ at three clinically relevant locations of the prostate.
20
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 222.1K citations · Full text
Liang-Chieh Chen, George Papandreou, Iasonas Kokkinos et al. · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2017 · 22.1K citations
Xiaolong Wang, Ross Girshick, Abhinav Gupta et al. · 2018 · 11.2K citations
Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas
Ozan Oktay, Jo Schlemper, Loïc Le Folgoc et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2018 · 4.6K citations · Full text
PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2
Jeffrey C. Weinreb, Jelle O. Barentsz, Peter L. Choyke et al. · European Urology · 2015 · 2.9K citations