Journal of Conservative Dentistry · 2019 · 10 citations · 19 references
DentistryDental Biomaterials ScienceEndodonticsCavity PreparationDental MaterialsRoot Canal TherapyCanal DebridementDental SealantsRoot Canal ObturationRoot-end Cavity PreparationRoot-end Filling MaterialsSealant MaterialsChitosanRetrograde Root Canal FillingRetrograde Root Canal PreparationRoot Canal Cleaning EfficacyScanning Electron MicroscopySmear Layer Modifying AgentsSmear Layer PenetrationSmear Layer Removal Agents
BACKGROUND: The smear layer acts as a physical barrier against penetration of root canal medicaments and sealers, thus compromising the seal leading to microleakage. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.2% chitosan solution, and 0.2% carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) used as smear layer removing agents in retrograde root canal preparation using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: . RESULTS: Group I (saline) was least efficient in the removal of the smear layer. Group II (17% EDTA), Group III (0.2% Chitosan), and Group IV (0.2% CMC) efficiently removed the smear layer from the retrograde cavity with mean scores 1.35, 1.60, and 1.35, respectively. Statistically, no significant difference found in Group II (17% EDTA), Group III (0.2% Chitosan), and Group IV (0.2% CMC). CONCLUSIONS: About 0.2% CMC and 0.2% chitosan can be better alternatives to 17% EDTA for smear layer removal due to their biological advantages.
19
Time-Dependent Effects of EDTA on Dentin Structures
S CALT, Ahmet Serper · Journal of Endodontics · 2002 · 605 citations
Carboxymethyl Chitosan And Its Applications
Vishnukant Mourya · Advanced Materials Letters · 2010 · 535 citations · Full text
Chemistry and application of chitin and chitosan
Keisuke Kurita · Polymer Degradation and Stability · 1998 · 390 citations