Publication | Open Access
Comparison of Free-Living and Laboratory Activity Outcomes from ActiGraph Accelerometers Worn on the Dominant and Non-Dominant Wrists
21
Citations
28
References
2020
Year
Wearable SystemPhysical ActivityNeuromuscular CoordinationAverage AccelerationAccelerometerWearable TechnologyMovement BiomechanicsUpper ExtremitySensorimotor RehabilitationMovement AnalysisKinesiologyExerciseNon-dominant WristsActivity OutcomesPhysical ExerciseApplied PhysiologyClinical ExercisePhysical MedicineHealth SciencesLaboratory Activity OutcomesRehabilitationHand TherapyExercise SciencePhysical Activity EpidemiologyExercise PhysiologyElectromyographyActigraph AccelerometersActigraph Accelerometers WornHuman MovementAthletic TrainingMedicine
This study evaluated agreement in activity outcomes from ActiGraph accelerometers worn on both wrists in a laboratory and free-living setting. Part 1: Thirty-seven participants (25.5 ± 10.5 years) completed laboratory activities. Part 2: Thirty-nine participants (28.5 ± 9.8 years) wore accelerometers for 7 days. Outcomes included average acceleration and the intensity gradient (IG). Part 1: Average acceleration was equivalent at the group level between devices across all activity intensities. Wide limits of agreement ranging from 20.6% lower to 34.9% higher for the dominant wrist across all activities were observed. Part 2: The IG was equivalent between wrist locations, but average acceleration was approximately 8.5% higher when measured from the dominant wrist. Adjusting average acceleration values by −8.5% from the dominant wrist resulted in average acceleration falling within a strict 5% equivalence zone. Reducing average acceleration values from the dominant wrist by 8.5% results in equivalent outcomes between wrists during free-living.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1