Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions · 2020 · 37 citations · 16 references
MedicineCardiologySurgeryClinical PharmacologyHemostasisInterventional CardiologyAnticoagulant TherapyAnticoagulation TherapyAntiplatelet TherapyAntithrombotic TherapyAtrial FibrillationThrombosisAtrial Fibrillation PathophysiologyPercutaneous Left Atrial Appendage ClosureSurgical Left Atrial Appendage ClosureTherapeutic AnticoagulationThrombosis PathophysiologyWatchman Device
Background: The impact of antithrombotic therapy on coagulation system activation after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remains unknown. This study sought to compare changes in coagulation markers associated with short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) versus antiplatelet therapy (APT) following LAAC. Methods: Prospective study including 78 atrial fibrillation patients undergoing LAAC with the Watchman device. F1+2 (prothrombin fragment 1+2) and TAT (thrombin-antithrombin III) were assessed immediately before the procedure, and at 7, 30, and 180 days after LAAC. Results: Forty-eight patients were discharged on APT (dual: 31, single: 17) and 30 on OAC (direct anticoagulants: 26, vitamin K antagonists: 4), with no differences in baseline-procedural characteristics between groups except for higher spontaneous echocardiography contrast in the OAC group. OAC significantly reduced coagulation activation within 7 days post-LAAC compared with APT (23% [95% CI, 5%–41%] versus 82% [95% CI, 54%–111%] increase for F1+2, P =0.007; 52% [95% CI, 15%–89%] versus 183% [95% CI, 118%–248%] increase for TAT, P =0.048), with all patients in both groups progressively returning to baseline values at 30 and 180 days. Spontaneous echocardiography contrast pre-LAAC was associated with an enhanced activation of the coagulation system post-LAAC (144 [48–192] versus 52 [24–111] nmol/L, P =0.062 for F1+2; 299 [254–390] versus 78 [19–240] ng/mL, P =0.002 for TAT). Device-related thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (6.4%), and all of them were receiving APT at the time of transesophageal echocardiography (10.2% versus 0% if OAC at the time of transesophageal echocardiography, P =0.151). Patients with device thrombosis exhibited a greater coagulation activation 7 days post-LAAC ( P =0.038 and P =0.108 for F1+2 and TAT, respectively). Conclusions: OAC (versus APT) was associated with a significant attenuation of coagulation system activation post-LAAC. Spontaneous echocardiography contrast pre-LAAC associated with enhanced coagulation activation post-LAAC, which in turn increased the risk of device thrombosis. These results highlight the urgent need for randomized trials comparing OAC versus APT post-LAAC.
16
David R. Holmes, Vivek Y. Reddy, Zoltan G. Turi et al. · The Lancet · 2009 · 2.2K citations
David R. Holmes, Saibal Kar, Matthew J. Price et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2014 · 1.8K citations
Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Srinivas R. Dukkipati, Saibal Kar, David R. Holmes et al. · Circulation · 2018 · 437 citations · Full text