Publication | Closed Access
The Fate of Ureteral Memokath Stent(s) in a High-Volume Referral Center: An Independent Long-Term Outcomes Review
14
Citations
17
References
2020
Year
<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To independently assess upper urinary tract Memokath (MMK-051) stent outcomes in a national tertiary referral center. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Two researchers, completely independent to the treating team, reviewed electronic MMK-051 stent(s) patient management records. Outcomes included time to first complication, complication(s)-severity, MMK-051 stent lifespan and change incidence, salvage therapy, further surgical intervention, and mortality. <b><i>Results and Limitations:</i></b> One hundred patients received 162 MMK-051 stent(s) (59% with malignant and 63% with distal ureteral obstruction [UO]) with only three lost to follow-up (FU). At 5-year mean FU, only 25 patients had complication-free original MMK-051 stents (14 alive, 11 dead). Of the remaining 75 patients, 22 had other stents, 12 had major surgery (e.g., nephrectomy), 3 became dialysis dependent, and 14 stabilized without ureteral stenting after original MMK-051 removal. Malignant obstruction patients had greater original MMK-051 stent longevity (<i>p</i> < 0.02), but also 20 of the 21 deaths (95%). The 72% mean 5-year stent complication rate included migration (46%), blockage (34%), nonfunctioning kidney (8%), urosepsis needing intravenous antibiotics (8%), and others (6%), including one postoperative death, one ureteral injury, and two with intractable pain. Median time to first complication was 12.5 months. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> MMK-051 stents had optimal utility in managing malignant UO and in those unfit for corrective surgery. Longer independently assessed mean 5-year outcomes review revealed much higher complication rates (72%) than previously reported. Future international metallic ureteral stent guidelines should encourage clinicians to adopt patient-centered multidisciplinary assessment and selection, with counseling plus goal-setting, and harmonized long-term protocol-based reporting, for optimized future patient safety and outcomes.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1