Fracture strength of endodontically treated lateral incisors restored with new zirconia reinforced rice husk nanohybrid composite

Galvin Sim Siang Lin, Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul Ghani, Noor Huda Ismail, KiranP Singbal, Devarasa Giriyapura Murugeshappa, Noraida Mamat

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry · 2020 · 11 citations · 24 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the fracture strength, fracture pattern and type of fracture of endodontically treated maxillary lateral incisors restored with new zirconia reinforced rice husk nanohybrid composite. Material and Methods: Eighty mature permanent maxillary lateral incisors from patients age range of 30-60 years with single canal were selected and randomly divided into: Group 1 -RCT + nanofilled composite (Filtek), Group 2 -RCT + microhybrid composite (Zmack), Group 3 -RCT + new nanohybrid composite (Zr-Hybrid) and Group 4 -Intact teeth (control). Standardized mesio-palatal-distal cavity was prepared, and endodontic treatment was carried out using crown-down technique until size 30, tapered 0.04. Obturation was completed using single cone technique with gutta-percha and AH plus sealer. Cavity access was restored with respective composite resins. Next, teeth were stored in incubator for 24 hours and subdivided into aged and unaged subgroups. Teeth in aged subgroups were subjected to 2500 thermal cycles for 5C, 37C and 55C with 30 seconds dwell time and 5 seconds transfer time. After that, root surfaces of teeth were covered with silicone-based material and placed in boxes filled with acrylic until the cemento-enamel-junction (CEJ) level. They were then tested under Universal Testing Machine until fracture occurred. Samples were then viewed under Leica microscope to determine the fracture pattern and type of fracture. Data analyzed using One-way ANOVA complimented by post hoc Tukey HSD and paired sample T test for fracture strength. Fracture pattern and type of fracture were analyzed using Chi-square test. Level of significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Significant differences were observed (p<0.05) with Group 3 demonstrating the highest fracture strength followed by Group 4, Group 1 and lastly Group 2 in both aged and unaged subgroups respectively. A significant

References

24