Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2021 · 12 citations · 149 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsCosmologyStellar AstronomyAstroparticle PhysicsDark MatterGalactic HaloDark Matter HaloesDark Matter HalosDark Matter PhenomenologyEquilibrium ModelsPhase-space Distribution FunctionsPhase-space StructureVelocity DistributionVelocity Distribution Functions
Dark matter (DM) capture in stars oers a rich phenomenology that makes it possible to probe a wide variety of particle DM scenarios in diverse astrophysical environments. In spite of decades of improvements to refne predictions of capture-related observables and better quantify astrophysical and particle-physics uncertainties, the actual impact of the Galactic phase-space distribution function of DM has been overlooked. In this work, we tackle this problem by making use of self-consistent equilibrium phase-space models based on the Eddington inversion formalism and an extension of this method to a DM halo with some degree of anisotropy in velocity space. We demonstrate that incorrectly accounting for the variation of the DM velocity distribution with position in the Galaxy leads to a systematic error between a factor two and two orders of magnitude, depending in particular on the target star, the DM candidate mass and the type of interaction involved. Moreover, we show that underlying phase-space properties, such as the anisotropy of the velocity tensor, actually play an important part-previously disregarded-and can have a sizable impact on predictions of capture rates and subsequent observables. We argue that Eddington-like methods, which self-consistently account for kinematic constraints on the components of the Galaxy, actually provide a reliable next-to-minimal approach to narrow down uncertainties from phase-space modeling on predictions of observables related to DM capture in stars.
149
A. G. A. Brown, A. Vallenari, T. Prusti et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2018 · 8.7K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +15
Masaharu Tanabashi, Katsuro Hagiwara, Ken‐ichi Hikasa et al. · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2018 · 7.2K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Physics, Cosmology +16
T. Prusti, J. H. J. de Bruijne, A. G. A. Brown et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2016 · 7K citations · Full text
MODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2010 · 4.3K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +17
Gerard Jungman, Marc Kamionkowski, K. Griest · Physics Reports · 1996 · 4.1K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +17