Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021 · 49 citations · 140 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsCosmologyGravitationBaryon Acoustic OscillationsBaryon PhysicsCosmic Microwave BackgroundCosmological ParametersDark EnergyObservational CosmologyBaryon StructureBaryonic ProcessesCosmological SimulationsDark Energy ConstraintsHydrodynamical Simulations Of Galaxy FormationJoint Cosmological ConstraintsLarge-scale Structure MappingLarge-scale Structure Simulations
ABSTRACT Measurements of large-scale structure are interpreted using theoretical predictions for the matter distribution, including potential impacts of baryonic physics. We constrain the feedback strength of baryons jointly with cosmology using weak lensing and galaxy clustering observables (3 × 2pt) of Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 data in combination with external information from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and Planck cosmic microwave background polarization. Our baryon modelling is informed by a set of hydrodynamical simulations that span a variety of baryon scenarios; we span this space via a Principal Component (PC) analysis of the summary statistics extracted from these simulations. We show that at the level of DES Y1 constraining power, one PC is sufficient to describe the variation of baryonic effects in the observables, and the first PC amplitude (Q1) generally reflects the strength of baryon feedback. With the upper limit of Q1 prior being bound by the Illustris feedback scenarios, we reach $\sim 20{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ improvement in the constraint of $S_8=\sigma _8(\Omega _{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}=0.788^{+0.018}_{-0.021}$ compared to the original DES 3 × 2pt analysis. This gain is driven by the inclusion of small-scale cosmic shear information down to 2.5 arcmin, which was excluded in previous DES analyses that did not model baryonic physics. We obtain $S_8=0.781^{+0.014}_{-0.015}$ for the combined DES Y1+Planck EE+BAO analysis with a non-informative Q1 prior. In terms of the baryon constraints, we measure $Q_1=1.14^{+2.20}_{-2.80}$ for DES Y1 only and $Q_1=1.42^{+1.63}_{-1.48}$ for DESY1+Planck EE+BAO, allowing us to exclude one of the most extreme AGN feedback hydrodynamical scenario at more than 2σ.
140
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2020 · 14.1K citations · Full text
<tt>emcee</tt>: The MCMC Hammer
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · 2013 · 11.9K citations · Full text
Computing, Computer Science, Physics +14
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2016 · 10.6K citations · Full text
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
The Astrophysical Journal · 1996 · 8.2K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +17
<i>Planck</i>2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan et al. · Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2014 · 6.6K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +16