IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2020 · 41 citations · 29 references
ManagementMathematicsEnergy EconomicsOptimizationSchedulingDistributed Energy ResourcesMicrogrid ManagementMicrogridsReal-time OptimizationSmart Grid SystemsSmart GridsMicrogrid DispatchMicrogrid OptimizationMicrogrid SchedulingModel DecompositionOnline OptimizationOperating Cost MinimizationOperation Cost AnalysisPriority Scheduling
In this paper, a dual-solver framework based on model predictive control (MPC) is proposed, E-solver and L-solver. The economic scheduling problem is formulated using mixedinteger linear programming (MILP), which can be solved in an efficient way by using commercial solver (E-solver). While the transmission loss problem is formulated using non-linear programming (NLP), which can be solved in the interior point method, namely L-solver. The E-solver provides an economic priority power scheduling plan for the L-solver, and the L-solver solves the entire microgrid accurate power flow scheduling plan. The proposed planning model decomposition technique aims to solve the planning model in a time-sharing manner and combines the characteristics of the two optimizers with a reasonable matching algorithm to achieve economic, efficient, and fast real-time control. A case study of a DC microgrid is employed to assess the performance of the online optimization-based control strategy. Simulations based on eight-node DC microgrid show that the method reduces the operating cost by 12.10% and increases the calculation speed by 80.18% compared with the traditional interior point method. With a shorter delay, the proposed optimization method will facilitate the implementation of real-time control and optimization.
29
Xiaonan Lu, Josep M. Guerrero, Kai Sun et al. · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2013 · 1K citations · Full text