Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

Beverley Shea, Barnaby C Reeves, George A. Wells et al. · BMJ · 2017 · 10.4K citations · Full text

Public Affairs, Health Policy, Evidence-based Practice +16

An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures

Olof Johnell, J. A. Kanis · Osteoporosis International · 2006 · 4.7K citations

Medicine, Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery +13

Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis

John P. A. Ioannidis, Sander Greenland, Mark A. Hlatky et al. · The Lancet · 2014 · 1.6K citations

Management, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Management +12

The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses

John P. A. Ioannidis · Milbank Quarterly · 2016 · 1.5K citations · Full text

Nursing, Biostatistics, Evidence-based Practice +11

New evidence pyramid

M. Hassan Murad, Noor Asi, Mouaz Alsawas et al. · Evidence-Based Medicine · 2016 · 1.3K citations · Full text

Nursing, Medical Education, Clinical Medicine +15