medRxiv · 2020 · 21 citations · 9 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesDiagnostic MicrobiologyRhinologySalivary DiagnosticsNasal ExaminationRespiratory Pathogen DiagnosticsMolecular Detection AssaysMolecular Pathogen DetectionNasal Swab CollectionNasopharyngeal Swab CollectionNegative Agreement PatternsSaliva-based DiagnosticsSars-cov-2 InfectionSpecimen Type Evaluation
Abstract We prospectively compared healthcare worker-collected nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) to self-collected anterior nasal swabs (ANS) and straight saliva for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in 354 patients. The positive percent agreement between NPS and ANS or saliva was 86.3% (95% CI: 76.7-92.9) and 93.8% (95% CI: 86.0-97.9), respectively. Negative percent agreement was 99.6% (95% CI: 98-100) for NPS vs. ANS and 97.8% (95% CI: 95.3 – 99.2) for NPS vs. saliva. NPS (n=80) and saliva (n=81) detected more cases than ANS (n=70), but no single specimen type detected all SARS-CoV2 infections.
9
Kelvin Kai‐Wang To, Owen Tak-Yin Tsang, Wai-Shing Leung et al. · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2020 · 3.4K citations · Full text
Clinical Significance of a High SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in the Saliva
Jin Gu Yoon, Jung Hee Yoon, Joon Young Song et al. · Journal of Korean Medical Science · 2020 · 332 citations · Full text