Publication | Open Access
Environmental Governance of China's Belt and Road Initiative
203
Citations
56
References
2020
Year
EngineeringEnvironmental ImpactsEnvironmental LawEnvironmental Impact AssessmentSustainability GovernanceSustainable DevelopmentLawRoad InitiativeEnvironmental EconomicsEnvironmental PlanningInternational Environmental LawGreen PolicyEnvironmental LegislationEnvironmental PolicyInstitutional ArchitectureEnvironmental ManagementReflexive Environmental GovernanceBelt And Road InitiativeEnvironmental GovernancePublic PolicyPublic InstitutionsEnvironmental JusticeGlobal EconomiesBri Partner CountriesSustainabilityGlobal SustainabilityInternational Institutions
China’s Belt and Road Initiative, launched in 2013, rapidly extends its political and economic influence to over 130 countries, raising critical questions about its environmental impacts and governance implications. The article investigates how China is rapidly building an institutional architecture for its envisioned “green BRI,” focusing on key actors, policies, and initiatives in environmental governance. The study analyzes the institutional architecture by examining the key actors, policies, and initiatives shaping environmental governance within the green BRI. The green BRI’s institutional architecture depends on voluntary corporate self‑governance and numerous international sustainability initiatives, yet its effectiveness relies on China’s commitments and the political will and capacity of partner countries to enforce stringent environmental laws, highlighting governance challenges and a research agenda.
Abstract China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched in 2013, is rapidly subsuming much of China's political and economic involvement abroad. As a far‐reaching infrastructure development and investment strategy, officially involving more than 130 countries, the expansion of the BRI raises important questions about its environmental impacts and its implications for environmental governance. This article examines how China is actively and rapidly developing an institutional architecture for its envisioned “green BRI,” considering the key actors, policies, and initiatives involved in the environmental governance of the BRI. We find that the current institutional architecture of the “green BRI” relies on voluntary corporate self‐governance and a multitude of international and transnational sustainability initiatives. The effectiveness of the environmental governance of the BRI not only hinges on China's priorities and commitments, but also on the political willingness and capacity of BRI partner countries to maintain, implement, and enforce stringent environmental laws and regulations. We conclude by outlining several environmental governance challenges and an agenda for future research.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1