Causality in curved spacetimes: The speed of light and gravity

Claudia de Rham, Andrew J. Tolley

Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2020 · 71 citations · 96 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

In low‑energy effective field theories of quantum electrodynamics and gravity, the speed of light or gravitational waves can be mildly superluminal in curved spacetimes, and small scattering‑time advances can arise from known EFT coefficients for photons or gravitons. The authors aim to explain why these superluminalities and time advances do not violate causality, analyticity, or Lorentz invariance, and to highlight subtleties in the gravitational context. They analyze the regime of validity of the effective theory and provide explicit criteria that cosmological and gravitational EFTs must satisfy to preserve causality. They show that consistent low‑energy EFTs self‑protect by rendering any calculated time advance or superluminality unresolvable, preventing a macroscopically enlarged light cone.

Abstract

Within the low-energy effective field theories of quantum electrodynamics and gravity, the low-energy speed of light or that of gravitational waves can typically be mildly superluminal in curved spacetimes. Related to this, small scattering time advances relative to the curved background can emerge from known effective field theory coefficients for photons or gravitons. We clarify why these results are not in contradiction with causality, analyticity or Lorentz invariance, and highlight various subtleties that arise when dealing with superluminalities and time advances in the gravitational context. Consistent low-energy effective theories are shown to self-protect by ensuring that any time advance and superluminality calculated within the regime of validity of the effective theory is necessarily unresolvable, and cannot be argued to lead to a macroscopically larger light cone. Such considerations are particularly relevant for putting constraints on cosmological and gravitational effective field theories and we provide explicit criteria to be satisfied so as to ensure causality.

References

96